Feck the straight-line mindset!

Source: nma.gov.au

Boring! Source: nma.gov.au

Please excuse me for utilizing the Irish version of a well-known four-letter profanity. It was picked up while visiting that lovely island last month. The milder term “feck” seemed to be the most appropriate word for titling this post with a needed touch of angst.

As most every urban planner knows, our friends in the civil engineering profession live and operate in a world of straight lines. It doesn’t matter whether they are designing and installing anything from streets, to water mains, to sanitary sewers, to storm sewers, to sidewalks, to trails, or to detention ponds. Their adherence to clean geometrics is all well and good from a construction efficiency standpoint, but far too often it fails to take into consideration the adverse side effects of such a fixed mindset.

IMG_0971

This is more like it – follow the natural terrain as much as possible.

First, Mother Nature rarely, if ever, operates in a straight line frame of mind. I challenge anyone to find a “natural” pond, lake, river, stream, bay, harbor, sea, or ocean with  perfectly straight and geometric boundaries on this lovely planet of ours. Obviously, Mother Nature has an innate sense of style that isn’t taught (or taught well) or respected in some civil engineering circles. This leads to unfortunate and often avoidable conflicts, as Mother Nature’s offspring are bound to get in the way of implementing modern engineering. Sadly, it is the trees, the vegetation, the wetlands, the unique terrain, and other natural features tend to get the short end of the stick in the battle with mighty bulldozers.

Second, where is the fun, whimsy, or joy in designing structures or objects that are nearly void of imagination? Who wants to follow a bland old straight line or to travel by foot and by bike along a trail that fails to meander? Where is the grand adventure in that? Granted, many a fine rail-to-trail corridor are largely straight, but that does not mean every single trail, path, or sidewalk must do the same thing. A little panache now and then is good for the soul and the imagination, let along the trees and other nature features they may actually avoid by thinking outside their silo’ed cyclinder.

Obviously, there are certain instances where building in straight lines are appropriate, logical, and practical.  But, that doesn’t mean they should be the de facto norm in every place and situation. A railroad following the terrain or utilizing tunnels is far more interesting (and less destructive) than the so-called “air-line railroads” that streaked absolutely straight across the landscape in a no holds barred blitzkrieg of boredom. Similarly, a hiking trail that respects its surrounding environment is infinitely more aesthetically pleasing and enjoyable than a sidewalk that drones aside the street without ever wavering in its never-ending quest to conquer the concept of curvature. Likewise, perhaps a slight curve or adjustment in the proposed street could preserve a marsh, a tree, a meadow, a sand dune, a moraine, and esker, or some other natural feature that would otherwise be toast.

Source: mb.org

Source: mbworld.org

Source: in.gov

Source: in.gov

Perhaps by speaking up early and often, we planners can actually help alter the shape of engineered things to come so they are not quite so mindlessly linear. Wouldn’t that be a nice and refreshing change for all? So…don’t be a lone voice in the wilderness – communicate your concerns with fellow planners each and every chance you get. As a group we can better effect change (improvement) upon not only our discipline, but also those outside planning where we may have legitimate concerns.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Active transportation, Advocacy, architecture, bicycling, Biking, Cars, cities, geography, government, history, infrastructure, land use, Passenger rail, planning, rail, spatial design, technology, trails, transit, transportation, urban planning and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Feck the straight-line mindset!

  1. Joe Stapley says:

    ECOR allows you to build in curves, contours, loopdy loops and arches. Our truly green design and building material is 100% bio-based. I am new to the industry and scratching my head why more designers and architects aren’t talking to us. Check out our website: http://www.ecorusa.com. Call and ask for Joe Stapley.

  2. Jill Young says:

    Here, here!! Well said. Time just yawns in front of you if you have a boring, straight lined walk ahead. Make a path interesting, undulating and curvy and allow a little intrigue to happen. How I’m saying this is very simplistic, I know, but it’s not really rocket science – people don’t need to study endlessly to know when they feel good in a place, or be told what sort of a path they would prefer to walk on.

  3. Naomi says:

    I am afraid, I am one of those people who tends to think in straight lines, although, I am certainly no engineer! I really enjoyed this point of view and it’s helped me to realize that I do enjoy hiking more when I can’t see exactly what’s ahead. I walk with my head up looking at things when I’m on a path with curves and turns. It’s easy to find ones self totally absorbed in ones self while walking with your head down, hands in pockets in a straight line from point A to point B.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s