Fertile places versus sterile spaces


Source: wikitravel.org

The two photos below were taken by me on Friday afternoon as I wandered the streets of historic and Boston, Massachusetts. The first one shows the beauty and fertile vitality of the Boston Common. Meanwhile, the second, just mere blocks away shows City Hall Plaza, which appears stark, cold, and largely devoid of ambiance unless you are a brick or concrete salesperson. One webpage referred to its architectural style as brutalist – a blunt description that is very accurate.

Personally, I felt City Hall Plaza was severely unwelcoming and sterile, while nearby Boston Common to be enchanting and inviting. Like Central Park in New York City and Millennium Park/Grant Park in Chicago, and Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, the Boston Common is a source of fresh air and peaceful respite amidst the chaotic urban realm, breathing renewed life into an otherwise barren (or brutal) brick and mortar setting.

We must cherish such idyllic icons as they not only bring the human scale back to the city, but also serve to re-energize our collective batteries. Most major cities have such fertile places. Sadly, most cities also have their share of sterile spaces. The trick for planners, architects, and landscape planners alike, is creating more of the former and less of the latter. It is essential what placemaking is all about. To me, “true placemaking” is impossible without the element of humanity. Otherwise, there is no perception or “sense” of place.

Perhaps, with the guiding hand of a landscape architect, Boston’s City Hall Plaza can be transformed into the kind of great public space it ought to be. Let’s all hope this can occur in the near future so that fervent life can be brought back into this brutal quadrant of Boston’s largely humane urban soul.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in architecture, art, cities, civics, civility, Communications, culture, economic development, entertainment, environment, fun, geography, health, historic preservation, history, humanity, infrastructure, land use, landscape architecture, nature, peace, placemaking, planning, product design, revitalization, skylines, spatial design, sprawl, sustainability, third places, tourism, Travel, urban planning, walking and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Fertile places versus sterile spaces

  1. basil berchekas jr says:

    Will stay in touch here! Excellent!

    Like

  2. gold account says:

    The city received a $155,000 planning grant in June through the state’s Gateway Cities Park Program. The Brockton Redevelopment Authority will oversee the grant, and city staff will work with Boston-based landscape architectural firm Brown, Richardson and Rowe.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s