Sharing the roads is NOT enough!

A year or so ago I wrote about how cyclists are sometimes our own worst enemies. One gist of that post was until the cycling community can come together and agree on ONE course of action regarding advocacy, it will be mired in division which weakens its overall argument. I still believe this is our greatest dilemma, as we have the competing interests between hardened and more-daring riders demanding equal access to the streets versus the rest of us who just want to be and feel safe and thus prefer clearly marked or protected bike lanes (see first photo below) and/or wholly separated bike routes (see second photo below). Sure, there is safety in numbers, but we first have to develop sufficient numbers to actually achieve the safety benefits.





Being more inclusive helps grow participation in bicycling and therefore raw numbers. What seasoned riders need to realize is that many women, youngsters, seniors, the disadvantaged, and those of us like me who are uncomfortable amid automobile traffic are not suited to nor capable of riding with traffic on city streets. Authors John Pucher and Ralph Buehler put it this way in the introduction to their excellent book, entitled City Cycling:

“Cycling should be made feasible, convenient, and safe for everyone; for women, as well as men, for all age groups, and for a wide range of physical abilities. The authors of this book take the view that cycling should not be limited to cyclists who are highly trained, fit, and daring enough to do battle with motor vehicles on busy roads. As demonstrated in many chapters, getting children, seniors, and women on bikes requires provision of safer and more comfortable cycling conditions than currently exist in most American, Australian, and British cities.” (page xii)



Hallelujah to Mr. Pucher and Mr. Buehler as you have hit proverbial the nail squarely on the head. Numbers (and subsequently safety) will not appreciably increase without more participation from those who are not currently part of the non-motorized community. To advocate for road sharing (or sharrowing) is simply not enough. If the greater bicycling community wants true safety in numbers…numbers that will be noticed by motor vehicle drivers, it must advocate and promote the development of a bicycling infrastructure that accommodates all, especially those with less riding ability. Otherwise, only the hardiest, the bravest, or the most daring will venture onto city streets and roadways, rarely producing the quantity of riders that is necessary to change public perceptions or to build a dynamic and diverse cycling culture.

This entry was posted in Active transportation, Advocacy, bicycling, bike sharing, Biking, Bus transportation, Cars, cities, civics, commerce, culture, diversity, economic development, education, environment, fitness, geography, health, Health care, humanity, inclusiveness, infrastructure, land use, logistics, Maps, new urbanism, placemaking, planning, politics, recreation, revitalization, spatial design, sustainability, third places, tourism, Trade, trails, transit, transportation, Travel, urban planning, walking, Women and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Sharing the roads is NOT enough!

  1. larryhogue says:

    I’m with you, as long as we cyclists who like to ride on roads aren’t banned from the roads because of adjacent bike paths. Diversity is the key. And speaking of sharrows, advocates in San Diego are turning against them after many were painted in inappropriate locations.


  2. Cherokee S. says:

    The problem here is the Us vs. Them mentality that is still very apparent in an otherwise good blog.
    Hardened and daring cyclists? I guarantee that the last thing I could be called is hardened and daring when I took up cycling as my only means of transportation.
    What I became is educated and enlightened.
    After reading Bob Mionskie’s Bicycling and the Law, I realized that I had a right to be in the travel lane, where it is safer.
    I was an edge riding cyclist who was afraid of all the same things every other edge riding cyclist is afraid of.
    The difference is that I didn’t have an advocacy group going to bat for me. I only had me. Then when the nations largest advocacy group had the ability to step up and help a working class poor single mom, they instead chose to label me as “fearless” and “not normal”.
    A PR campaign designed to further their bike lane agenda.
    The “hardened cyclists” took me under their wing and gave me the moral support I needed. Support that was chillingly lacking by those who advocated for bike lanes because grown men are scared to ride in the travel lane.
    A woman who is doing good just to get by is now carrying your emotionally burdened ass on her back to keep cycling legal and safe in America.
    It would be really nice if you all would get a bloody education and learn what constitutes safe cycling.


    • problogic says:

      Cycling infrastructure in a community should be designed to accommodate those from age 8 to 80. While riding in the street with traffic is comfortable for you and many others, it is not a viable or safe option for those at the upper and lower ends of that age range, nor for those who feel intimidated by motor vehicles.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.