Source: visitmorgancountyin.com
The title of this post might sound a bit harsh, but here’s the thought process behind it:
- Humans rarely, if ever, have contributed to the long-term growth and maturation of a natural site – that’s Mother Nature’s handiwork.
- More often than not, humans have damaged and degraded natural sites for economic gain.
- A nature preserve or similar conservation area is open to the public and is essentially a public benefit and domain. Naming a nature preserve after one person or family makes it sound more like a possession.
- While no one should dismiss the generosity of those who help(ed) preserve a natural site, naming it after a single, large donor fails to properly and fairly recognize the many smaller donors, as well as those who may have contributed countless volunteer hours. A non-obtrusive sign can be dedicated to those all who made the nature preserve possible, including large donors.
- A nature preserve’s name should depict and celebrate its environmental uniqueness, not serve as a personal ego boost or branding idea.
- Humans can have plenty of things named after them, such as buildings, landscaped gardens, cities, historic sites, airports, parks, and a myriad of other human-built items. Let Mother Nature’s delicate handiwork be enjoyed and celebrated without human interference, including in its name.
Am I wrong? Please feel free to disagree respectfully.
Source: artsignworks.com
If this topic interests you, here’s an excellent book about one particular preserve in Michigan.
*A small commission is earned from purchases that are made using these links to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
problogic
Panethos 