Stop toying with AMTRAK funding, dammit!

Source: n8qnp.com

Source: n8qnp.com

I am so sick and tired of the conservative element in Congress annually trying to defund all or part of AMTRAK. Who are these fools? AMTRAK is regularly setting records for ridership and they want to reduce funding – approximately 30% for fiscal year 2014. Is that a bass ackwards approach or what? Here are some important facts about AMTRAK:

Basic Amtrak Facts
  • During FY 2012 (October 2011 – September 2012), Amtrak welcomed aboard more than 31.2 million passengers, the largest annual total in its history, and the ninth annual ridership record in the last ten years. Every day, an average of more than 85,000 passengers ride more than 300 Amtrak trains.
  • Amtrak operates a nationwide rail network, serving more than 500 destinations in 46 states, the District of Columbia and three Canadian provinces on more than 21,300 miles of routes, with approximately 20,000 employees. It is the nation’s only high-speed intercity passenger rail provider, operating at a top speed of 150 mph (241 kph). More than half of its trains operate at top speeds of 100 mph (160 kph) or greater.
  • Amtrak is building the equipment, infrastructure and organization it needs to sustain growing ridership.
  • Amtrak is investing in critical projects that will enhance the passenger experience, sustain the national passenger network, provide much-needed capacity and improve reliability and safety.
  • Amtrak is taking steps to improve financial performance and accountability with new cost controls, efficiency improvements, and debt reduction measures that will combine with better service, record ridership and resulting revenue increases to improve our bottom line.

Amtrak plays an important role in the national transportation network by providing travelers with a safe, efficient and reliable alternative that mitigates the effect of high gas prices and pervasive highway and airline congestion.

  • In FY 2012, Amtrak earned approximately $2.877 billion in revenue and incurred approximately $4.036 billion in expense. No country in the world operates a passenger rail system without some form of public support for capital costs and/or operating expenses.
  • In FY 2012, Amtrak covered 88 percent of operating costs with ticket sales and other revenue.
  • In 2011, an average of more than 831,000 people every weekday depended on commuter rail services that used Amtrak-owned infrastructure, dispatching, shared operations, or rode commuter trains operated or maintained by Amtrak under contracts with local or regional agencies.
  • The Amtrak Northeast Corridor (NEC) is the busiest railroad in North America, with more than 2,200 trains operating over some portion of the Washington-Boston route each day. Approximately 260 million intercity and commuter rail passengers rely on the NEC each year.
  • When included among U.S. airlines, Amtrak ranks No. 6 in domestic passengers carried. In the Northeast Corridor, Amtrak now has a very strong position in many markets that were previously dominated by air carriers.
    • Amtrak carried more than three times as many riders between Washington and New York City as the airline industry.
    • Amtrak carried more riders between New York and Boston than all of the airlines combined.

I guess I shouldn’t be totally surprised as some members of Congress are beholding to Big Oil (namely a pair of brothers from Wichita), but common sense is common sense. A modern and comprehensive transportation system must consist of many forms of transportation – from cars to bicycles, to buses, to trains, to planes, to walking, to transit, to so on and so on.  Leave any aspect out and it disrupts the entire system – just ask those in the Northeast when the train system is down due to a hurricane or accident.

What these yahoos don’t seem to get is if more people are riding AMTRAK, then our supply of oil will be extended offering the oil companies profits over an extended period of time. Duh – politicians should be able to figure that one out…even ones from oil states.

It’s high time Congress as a whole worried about more important things than taking swipes at AMTRAK funding. How about ending the tax breaks and subsidies for oil companies instead? They seem to be making a sufficient profit. That’s a change that most of America (except oil-rich states) will gladly cheer.

Three favorite hybrid car logos

Below are my three favorite hybrid car nameplate logos. The first (and easily my favorite) is from Ford and includes a small segment of roadway with a green leaf. To me, this says it all and is a great design for sustainability branding. Pre-2013 models have the roadway/leaf logo on the left side of the “hybrid” text, while 2013 models have it following the text.

Source: nvate.com

Source: nvate.com

The second comes from the leader in hybrid car technology, Toyota. While not as eye-popping as Ford’s logo, you know it when you see it on the Prius, Camry, and Highlander.

Source: examiner.com

Source: examiner.com

Lastly is one that is still visible on the roads but becoming rarer due to GM’s decision to end the Saturn brand a few years back. Personally, I thought Saturn had GM’s best line-up of cars at the time of its demise. This logo s very noticeable due to the enlarged “H.” It can be seen on the Saturn Vue.

Source: fanpop.com

Source: fanpop.com

While other car manufacturers build hybrid cars, none of the logos I have seen have the pizzaz of these three. Hopefully, as time passes, more innovative forms of hybrid nameplate logos will become evident in the market.

A 33 foot wide slice of heaven

Source: wacf.org

Source: wacf.com

I am sitting in the front patio of our cottage on Lake Wawasee, Indiana as I am writing this post, listing to the birds sing their morning serenade, the soft breeze blow through the trees, blue lake waters gently lapping the sand beach, and the occasional distant boat motor. It is Monday morning and I am enjoying our family’s 33 foot slice of heaven on Earth.

My parents, namely my mother, astutely purchased this 1909 cottage 30 years ago. It may not be the largest cottage or lot on Lake Wawasee, but it is indeed a sweet slice of heaven…a place to relax, rest, and unwind, particularly during the week or offseason, as things get a bit hectic around here on summer weekends.

Source: commons.wikimedia.org

Source: commons.wikimedia.org

Some may say, I didn’t know Indiana had any natural lakes. To me, that’s a good thing…staying under the radar, so we can enjoy the peace and tranquility here in the northeast part of the state without intrusion by hoards of funseekers.

In reality, there are approximately 1,000 lakes in the northeast quarter of Indiana stretching from near Rochester to the Michigan line at Angola. They continue into the Irish Hills of Southeast Michigan and eventually west and north of Detroit. At approximately 2,900 acres, Lake Wawasee is the largest natural lake in the state.

Each time I see a Great blue heron standing at attention on our dock; see the steady stream of monarch butterflies fluttering southwest across the blue waters; hear the V-formation flocks of geese fly overhead; fall asleep to the light chop of the lake waters; enjoy the company of family, friends, and neighbors; paddle a kayak along the shoreline; or see the regatta of sailboats on summer Sunday mornings, I am reminded how very lucky we are to have such a sweet place of respite.

DSC00833

Where utility-scale solar is HOT!

Source: webweaver.nu

Source: webweaver.nu

Below are charts showing the rapid growth in utility-scale solar project during the first quarter of 2013 and a comprehensive listing of those states with the most utility-scale solar power generation.The data is from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).

Megawatts Under Construction

      First Quarter 2013

1.     California – 3,525 megawatts

2.     Arizona – 495

3.     Nevada – 468

4.     Texas – 75

5.     North Carolina – 70

6.     Florida – 40

7.     New Mexico – 30

8.     New Jersey – 25

9.     Idaho – 20

10.  Indiana – 10

Total Existing/Planned/UC

(minimum 40 Megawatts)

1.     California – 19,213 megawatts

2.     Nevada – 5,362

3.     Arizona – 3,111

4.     Florida – 1,140

5.     Texas – 883

6.     New Mexico – 593

7.     North Carolina – 386

8.     Colorado – 377

9.     New Jersey – 288

10.  Utah – 155

11.  Ohio – 104

12.  Idaho – 90

13.  Illinois – 90

14.  Massachusetts – 77

15.  Washington – 75

16.  Hawaii – 72

17.  Maryland -64

18.  Pennsylvania – 58

19.  Indiana – 50

20.  Georgia – 42

Europe’s largest indoor performance halls

Royal Albert Hall - Source: commons.wikimedia.org

Royal Albert Hall – Source: commons.wikimedia.org

While tabulating the data listed below, I was quite surprised at the famous cities and venues that are not included in the list. This may be partially due to the minimum 2,000 seat size chosen, but may also have to do with the age of facilities, the number of communities with performance halls, lack of available data, multiple existing venues, and smaller national populations. Still, one would expect performance halls in cities like Moscow, St. Petersburg, Stockholm, Oslo, Helsinki, Warsaw, Prague, Budapest, Copenhagen, Naples, Dresden, Krakow, Lisbon, Athens, Zurich, and Vienna to reach the threshold. If there are any that I missed, please feel free to pass them along. FYI – sports arenas and outdoor venues are not included in this list.

Venue (location) – seating (date completed)

1.     Royal Albert Hall (London, England) – 5,544 (1871)

2.     Kuppelsaal (Frankfurt, Germany) – 4,600 (1963)

3.     Sala Palatului (Bucharest, Romania) – 4,060 (1960)

4.     Bilkent Odeon (Ankara, Turkey) – 4,000 (1999)

5.     National Palace of Culture (Sofia, Bulgaria) – 4,000

6.     Usher Hall (Edinburgh, Scotland) – 2,900 (1914)

7.     Royal Festival Hall (London, England) – 2,900 (1951)

8.     Santa Ceceilia Hall (Rome, Italy) – 2,756 (2003)

9.     Opera Bastille (Paris, France) – 2,703 (1989)

10.  De Doelen (Rotterdam, Netherlands) – 2,700 (1996)

11.  Festspielhaus (Baden-Baden, Germany) – 2,500 (1989)

12.  Royal Concert Hall (Glasgow, Scotland) – 2,500 (1990)

13.  Alte Oper (Frankfurt, Germany) – 2,500 (1180)

14.  Halle aux Grains (Toulouse, France) – 2,500 (1861)

15.  Royal Concert Hall (Nottingham, England) – 2,499 (1982)

16.  Grober Saal (Berlin, Germany) – 2,440 (1963)

17.  Bridgewater Hall (Manchester, England) – 2,400 (1996)

18.  Gasteig (Munich, Germany) – 2,387 (1985)

19.  Auditirio Nacional de Musica (Madrid, Spain) – 2,324 (1988)

20.  Caird Hall (Dundee, Scotland) – 2,300 (1923)

21.  Oval Hall (Sheffield, England) – 2,271 (1932)

22.  Symphony Hall (Birmingham, England) – 2,266 (1991)

23.  Waterfront Hall (Belfast Northern Ireland) – 2,223 (1997)

24.  L’Auditori (Barcelona, Spain) – 2,200 (1999)

25.  Palau de la Musica Catalana (Barcelona, Spain) – 2,200 (1908)

26.  Grobes Festpielhaus (Salzburg, Austria) – 2,179 (1960)

27.  Euskalduna Concert Hall (Bilbao, Spain) – 2,164 (1999)

28.  Palais des Beaux Arts (Brussels, Belgium) – 2,150 (1929)

29.  Elbe Philharmonic Hall (Hamburg, Germany) – 2,150 (2009)

30.  Auditorium Maurice Ravel (Lyon, France) – 2,150 (1975)

31.  Grand Canal Theater (Dublin, Ireland) – 2,100 (2009)

32.  Concertgobouw (Amsterdam, Netherlands) – 2,037 (1888)

33.  Barbican Hall (London, England) – 2,026 (1982)

34.  Laeiszhalle (Hamburg, Germany) – 2,023 (1904)

35.  La Scala (Milan, Italy) – 2,013 (1778)

36.  Koningin Elisabethzaal (Antwerp, Belgium) – 2,000

37.  St. David’s National Concert Hall (Cardiff, Wales) – 2,000 (1982)

38.  Helmet List Halle (Graz, Austria) – 2,000 (2002)

39.  Lutfi Kirdar Concert Hall (Istanbul, Turkey)

40.  Audutorio Alfredo Kraus (Las Palmas, Canary Islands) – 2,000 (1997)

41.  Del Montfort Hall (Leicester, England) 2,000 (1913)

42.  Nouveau Siecle (Lille, France) – 2,000

43.  Guild Hall (Portsmouth, England) – 2,000

44.  Stadthalle (Wuppertal, Germany) -2,000 (1896)

Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_concert_halls

Do you…Smart Commute?

Source" midmeac.org

Source” midmeac.org

Here in Greater Lansing we are in the midst of day number three of Smart Commute 2013 – a two-week long competition between teams who toss aside the passe’ OPOC (one person one car) mindset and utilize smart/clean/active transportation options for daily trips to work, school, church, shopping, etc. Smart Commute mode options include cycling, walking, carpooling, telecommuting, vanpooling, public transit, kayaking, and other similar modes.

commute-odor

Source: thirdwave-websites.com

Teams can consist of co-workers, classmates, church goers, neighborhoods, friends, and other combinations and tally each smart commute trip (one direction) as one point. The team with the most points by the end of the two weeks wins. But, the longer term goal is to get people out of their cars for more than just two weeks. This benefits their health, their pocketbook, the environment, and reduces congestion on local streets. Sounds like a win-win-win-win situation. That’s better than chances of winning the lottery.

Source: ecovelo.info

Source: ecovelo.info

Smart Commute was established and is organized by the Mid-Michigan Environmental Action Coalition (Mid-MEAC). For more details on Smart Commute, here is a weblink.

Jetson’s-style pizza delivery by drone

imagesCAWC8FCP

Source: bebelestrange.tumblr.com

Just when I think I have heard everything, a news story comes along that boggles your mind. According to several reports, Domino’s Pizza is testing pizza delivery by drone in the United Kingdom. Yes, you read that correctly, pizza delivery by drone. All I could think of was this story sounded like something straight out of The Jetson’s 1960s cartoon series. Then I thought about it from a practical planner’s standpoint began to wonder what we were potentially getting ourselves into.

Source: money.cnn.com

Source: money.cnn.com

Imagine if you will, Domino’s, Pizza, Jet’s Pizza, Cottage Inn, Little Caesars, Hungry Howies, Papa John’s, Donato’s, and a billion or more other pizza chains all using drones stationed at each location. Given their logo (see below), one would have thought that Jet’s would have come up with this idea first. Could you possibly imagine the constant humming and droning sound of these things buzzing about the skies, especially on weekends or during the Super Bowl? I pity the poor birds, butterflies, and bees who’ll have to negotiate their newly cluttered low altitude airspace.

Source: hotelgraphics.com

Source: hotelgraphics.com

Then from a transportation safety standpoint, who is going to make sure all these low flying aircraft are not colliding with each other and plummeting to the ground in a heap of melted mozzarella and anchovies? And what about us on the ground – are we going to have to duck and cover every time one of these things buzzes past us? Lastly, will these things need to be monitored by air traffic control or are they able to fly about freely as long as they don’t exceed and certain altitude? If so, it sounds like a great way to burden the system and increase the potential for errors.

From an economic standpoint, I understand that using drones for pizza delivery would significantly lower labor costs. Likewise, I doubt anyone has to give a tip to a drone, nor are drones apt to be robbed. Given there are 70,000 pizzerias in the United States and approximately 83 percent offer delivery, that is a potential for more than 58,000 drones zipping about the country. I am not sure the world is ready for thousands of low-flying aircraft buzzing just above our heads or knocking on our front doors? I guess I could drone on and on about this topic, but I will leave further punning to that doozy.